Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 131

Anonymous

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1819

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1819-09-15

Decided 1819-09-15

¶1Application was made for a continuance of this case to the next Term, but it was contended the affidavit did not contain sufficient matter to warrant the application; and after much dispute, the court decided that on motions for continuances the following causes should be shown by the Affidavit:

¶2Ist That there is a material witness in the case.

¶3ad That such witness is absent from the Territory.

¶43d That the party has used due diligence to obtain his attendance; and this must be determined by a subpoena taken out and returned non est.

¶54th That he expects to obtain his attendance at the next Term of the court.

¶65th That he expects to prove a credit, or something material by the witness.

¶76th That he is a competent witness,

¶8and 7th That the application is not made for the purpose of delay. —

/3/blumesupcttrans/131 · .json · Public domain