In Re Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff) (1982), In Re Aztec Co. (1989)
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325
Relies on Matter of Curtis · In Re Blevins · In Re Tatum · In Re Fizer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the same treatment for each claim within a particular class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.