Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 BTA 301 - Moores v. Commissioner

Moores v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 1950
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1950

301926193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is essential to the validity of a gift that there be a distinct delivery of property so as to show that the donor has relinquished all dominion over it The donor went as far in this case as he could have gone, unless he had secured the appointment of a guardian or trustee to manage the property of his daughters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.