Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Cai. Cas. 102

Bayard v. Malcom

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1805

New York Supreme Court · decided 1805-05-15

THE notice of motion was not for the first day of term, accounted for this by an affidavit, stating that he had absolutely forgotten the day on which the term commenced, imagining it to be one week later than it really was. objected to the reception of this excuse, as Mr. Towt was the attorney on the record, therefore for him the forgetfulness of Mr. Munro could afford no excuse.

Decided 1805-05-15

Per curiam.

¶1There can be no doubt of the mistake, nor, but that the whole is in good faith.

¶2Though Mr. Towt appears the attorney on record, every one knows the connexion between him and Mr. Munro. He is to be supposed to act only under the direction of Mr. Munro.

/3/caicas/102 · .json · Public domain