Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Cai. Cas. 190

Haughtalling v. Bronk

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1805

New York Supreme Court · decided 1805-08-15

TAN VECHTEN on an affidavit in a writ of right, setting forth that one of the electors, returned on the grand assize, bad left the state, moved to amend the pannel by adding ⅛

Decided 1805-08-15

¶1-£⅛* curiam, as there is no opposition take your rule#

Thompson, J.

¶2I do'not see how it is possible for the court to grant the motion. If they do, the elector will be appointed contrary to the act, and all proceedings uncles' such a pannel consequently void. My opinion is, that you should have a new elector appointed in the same way as the others. I think we have a power to order the sheriff to summon another pannel; but I do not think we can direct another elector to be added.

/3/caicas/190 · .json · Public domain