Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Cal. 441

Buckley v. Manife

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1853

California Supreme Court · decided 1853-10-15

The complaint in this case set forth, that the said defendants (the said Manife as principal, and Runnels as surety), on the 6th July, 1851, entered into an agreement with the plaintiff, by the description of L. R. Buckley & Co., whereby a copartnership was formed for cutting hay; by the terms of which agreement, plaintiff agreed to lend the said Manife such an amount of money not exceeding $1000, as might be necessary on his part of the business, which the said Manife bound…

Decided 1853-10-15

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

¶2We have heretofore decided, that under the statute a defendant cannot be a witness for his co-defendant, when the defence is general, and would operate in discharge of both. It is now urged, that in the present case but one defendant was upon trial, *443the other not having been served with process in time. But this cannot alter the rule. A verdict upon the issue, which appears on the record in favor of one defendant, would be conclusive in an action against the other.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/3/cal/441 · .json · Public domain