3 Cal. 3d 875 - Foreman & Clark Corp. v. Fallon’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 766 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 781 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 35 Cal. 3d 197 - Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp. (1983), 9 Cal. 3d 51 - Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973)
2 federal appellate · 766 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estate of Bristol v. Young · 46 Cal. 2d 690 - Primm v. Primm · Bagdasarian v. Gragnon · Nichols v. Mitchell · 21 Cal. 2d 654 - Hicks v. Reis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 781 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are required to set forth in their brief all the material evidence on the point and not merely their own evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'questions as to the weight and sufficiency of the evidence, the construction to be put upon it, the inferences to be drawn therefrom, the credibility of witnesses ... and the determination of [any] conflicts and inconsistencies in their testimony are matters for the trial court to resolve' "].) We "start with the presumption that the record contains evidence sufficient to support the judgment; it is the appellant's burden to demonstrate otherwise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'When a finding of fact is attacked on the ground that there is not any substantial evidence to sustain it, the power of an appellate court begins and ends with the determination as to whether there is any substantial evidence contradicted or uncontradicted which will support the finding of fact.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.