Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Cal. 4th 195 - People v. Pride

3 Cal. 4th 195 - People v. Pride’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

419
cited by 419 later decisions
5
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 400 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 419 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 83 - People v. Crittenden (1994), People v. Osband (1996)

10 federal appellate · 400 state decisions

16401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Boykin v. Alabama · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Powers v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 419 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prosecutor is not prevented from introducing all the circumstances of a duly noticed incident or transaction simply because each and every circumstantial fact was not recited therein”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “factors be present in some special combination or that they be accorded a particular weight.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`accept antiseptic stipulations in lieu of photographic evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.