3 Cal. 5th 583 - People v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited
43 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Blakely v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“].) Munoz argues that Juror Two forfeited any right to privacy by writing to the trial court and requesting to meet with the judge. We disagree. In writing the letter to the trial court, Juror Two did not reveal his or her contact information to anyone who did not already have it. The letters were not directed to the parties, who obtained the letters from the trial court with the identifying information redacted. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by preserving Juror Two's confidentiality despite the letters. F. Admission Of A Photograph Of Munoz Smiling Did Not Result In A Miscarriage Of Justice Munoz argues the trial court should have excluded a photograph of him smiling during his arrest under Evidence Code section 352, which grants courts the discretion to "exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will ... create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“' CALJIC No. 8.88 properly instructs the jury on its sentencing discretion and the nature of its deliberative process.' [Citation.] Its instruction that 'jurors may impose a death sentence only if the aggravating factors are”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“California does not deny capital defendants equal protection of the law by providing certain procedural protections to noncapital defendants that are not afforded to capital defendants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.