3 Cal. App. 387 - Lowe v. Ozmun’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 1977 · most notably Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co. (1945), 13 Cal. 2d 144 - Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. (1939)
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. Hughes · Lowe v. Ozmun · Dodge v. Meyer · Williams v. Hahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In addition to all this, no tender of the debt was averred in the original complaint, and the facts upon which the claim of conversion was based—namely, that he had appropriated to his own use the bonds, the value of which was in excess of the debt, which in law amounted to a satisfaction of the debt,—are clearly set forth in the original complaint, ...” (Italics ours.) (Lowe v. Ozmun, 3 Cal. App. 387, 395 [ 86 Pac. 729, 732 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.