Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CALAPP2D 277 - Smith v. Hale

Smith v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1963
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 116 Cal. App. 114 - Vertson v. City of Los Angeles · 116 Cal. App. 102 - Jones v. Foster · O'Rourke v. Vennekohl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial of an action is a formal and final proceeding; the welfare of society served by the court demands that the parties to litigation have convenient opportunity to fully present the evidence pertinent to their conflicting claims and then that such litigation be expeditiously terminated. To that end it exacts of the parties a high degree of diligence in discovering and presenting at the trial all the evidence upon which the cause is to be determined.” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.