Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CALAPP2D 521 - People v. Anderson

People v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2012

20 state decisions

80193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 24 Cal. App. 604 - People v. Grubb · 67 Cal. App. 1 - People v. Steffner · 25 Cal. App. 9 - People v. De Martini

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a public offense is committed in part in one county and in part in another, or the acts or effects thereof constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur in two or more counties, the jurisdiction is in either county. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.