Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CALAPP3D 404 - Feist v. Rowe

Feist v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2008

23 state decisions

1401970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. United States · Morgan v. United States · 35 Cal. 2d 242 - Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners · 41 Cal. 2d 546 - Board of Education v. Dresden Swan · 81 Cal. App. 2d 384 - Hohreiter v. Garrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under section 13443 since neither factor standing alone could involve the welfare of the school or students. In the instant case, on the other hand, the cause for Lindros' termination was his classroom use of indecent language, a matter which (like the lack of tact in Griggs , the severe grading techniques in Raney , or the inadequate supervision in San Lorenzo ) by its very nature relates to the welfare of the school and its pupils. Of course, depending upon the underlying circumstances in each case, including the teacher's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “auditory perception of all the evidence by each board member who votes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “certainly relate to the welfare of the schools and the pupils....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.