Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CALAPP4TH 16 - People v. Hill

People v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably 27 Cal. 4th 1230 - People v. Steele (2002), People v. Nesler (1997)

30 state decisions

240199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. Clark · Rideau v. Louisiana · Tanner v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “comprehends both the probative value of evidence and its relationship to a matter which is provable in the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any tendency in reason to prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.