Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CALAPP4TH 482 - People v. Martin

People v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 867 - People v. Coleman · 128 Cal. App. 3d 253 - People v. Jones · 44 Cal. App. 3d 753 - People v. Turner · 176 Cal. App. 3d 1161 - In Re Falco · People v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A consummated plea bargain is not a perpetual license to a defendant to violate his probation. The plea bargain does not insulate a defendant from the consequences of his future misconduct. ‘A defendant gets the benefit of his bargain only once. Like time, a plea bargain once spent is gone forever.’ [Citations.]” (People v. Bookasta, supra, 136 Cal.App.3d at pp. 299-300, quoting People v. Jones, supra, 128 Cal.App.3d at p. 262 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[A]fter the violation occurred, there was no plea bargain involved because the bargain contemplated the initial sentencing proceeding only. It was within the discretion of the trial court to look at the situation anew, to continue or revoke probation, to commit [defendant] to the Youth Authority, a local or state institution. There was no abuse of discretion.” (Id. at p. 757.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.