Regalado v. Callaghan CA’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 4th 548 - Soule v. General Motors Corp. · 52 Cal. 3d 1 - Shoemaker v. Myers · 2 Cal. 3d 1 - Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District · 33 Cal. 4th 780 - Cassim v. Allstate Insurance · 27 Cal. 4th 198 - Hooker v. Department of Transportation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“somewhat misleading in that they suggest[ed] that in order for the hirer to 'affirmatively contribute' to the plaintiff's injuries, the hirer must have engaged in some form of active direction or conduct. However, 'affirmative contribution need not always be in the form of actively directing a contractor or contractor's employee. There will be times when a hirer will be liable for its omissions.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Passively permitting an unsafe condition to occur rather than directing it to occur does not constitute affirmative contribution.' (Special Instruction No. 8.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“requirement simply means that there must be causation between the hirer's conduct and the plaintiff's injury. Because”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.