Wertheim, LLC v. Omidvar’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 3d 68 - People v. Beardslee · 213 Cal. App. 2d 718 - Fritschi v. Teed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“make such further provision for assumption of such costs and attorney fees by one or more of the adverse claimants as may appear proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although equity certainly would have countenanced Wertheim paying at least some of the fees, equity does not demand that it do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court could reasonably find it proper that the party that necessitated the interpleader action pay for it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.