¶1I concur in what is said above, but, to avoid any misunderstanding, I desire to say that I see nothing in the testimony which warrants making the moneys paid by Hawley H. Gfillett to the widow and personal representative of his deceased copartner, a charge on the share of the infant complainant. I think that if any payments shall be shown to have been made under such circumstances as to warrant an allowance for them, in the account of rents and profits, they must be set off against the share of the widow only.
3 Colo. 351
Gillett v. Gaffney
Decided April 15, 1877
Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1877-04-15
Jairus Richardson and Hawley H. Gillett were copartners doing business in the city of Denver, from 1860 to the 29th of January, 1865. Held: occupied and enjoyed the premises in controversy, to the exclusion of the complainants, and who, together with John W. Webster, the'administrator of Hawley, are made parties defendant.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1877-04-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2001
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →