State v. Fernandes’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1982
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Slavski · State v. Lenihan · State v. Torello · State v. Couture
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The necessity for the existence of such an exception [to the hearsay rule] is found in the practically unendurable inconvenience of summoning public officers from their posts on the innumerable occasions when their *Page 387 official doings or records are to be proved in litigation'; and the general trustworthiness of such evidence is found in the circumstances under which the statements are made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Melechinsky“[w]e feel that state's exhibit . . . Insofar as it was a record authorized to be kept by the commissioner under the statute, was, being properly certified, admissible in evidence as to the facts therein stated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Melechinsky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.