Blue v. Stout

Decided October 15, 1824

New York Supreme Court · decided 1824-10-15

A motion was made, in this cause, to amend the ae etiam of the capias ad respondendum, which the attorney for the Plaintiff> by mistake, issued in covenant, when it should have been in assumpsit. This was opposed, because special bail had been put in.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1862

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1824-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Curia.

¶1The bail have no right to object to the amendment.(a) The motion must be granted, on payment of costs.

¶2Rule accordingly.

¶3 Vid. Christie v. Walker, 1 Bingham, 68.