Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 CUSTCT 308 - Gresham v. United States

Gresham v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2000
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2000

1019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This ease seems to be one where the rule “De minimis non lex curat” should be applied. The amount of alcohol is not substantial. A substance such as this does not come within the purpose of Congress in applying the higher rates of paragraph 24.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.