3 Day 340
Decided June 15, 1809
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1809-06-15
This was an action of trover, for certain goods, wares, anc] merchandise, specified in the declaration, The defendant pleaded the general issue, * ° On ⅛6 tr’ab b appeared, that the plaintiff was an °®cer> aB ? virtue of the following bill of sale from Hazard: “ Know all men by these presents, that I, Francis Hazard, of the town of Men-London, in the county of Menu-London, and state of Connecticut, for the consideration Df one thousand dollars, received to my full…
Decided 1809-06-15
¶1The bill of sale is not on the race of it fraudulent, although the whole transaction may have been a fraud as against creditors.
¶2The facts disclosed on the motion do not warrant the decision of the court, that the bill of sale and conveyance was by law fraudulent against the attachment of creditors, nor the charge to the jury on that point.
¶3New trial to be granted.