¶1This is the usual mode of corn» paring papers. The proof is sufficient to entitle the party to read the copy.
¶2Vide M‘Neil v. Pe chard, 1 Esp. Cas. 263.
3 Day 499
Lynde v. Judd
Decided February 15, 1807
Connecticut Superior Court · decided 1807-02-15
ACTION of assumpsit. _ _ . , , , , , „ , On trial to the jury, Dwight, tor the defendant, oilered Mr. Ingersoll as a witness to prove a paper in his hands. Mr Ingersoll himself objected to producing the paper, It appeared that the paper had been delivered to him, as counsel in another case by a client, with instructions not to make use of it in court. ' By the Court. Mr; Ingersoll cannot be compelled to exhibit it.
Decided 1807-02-15