¶1The CoijRT (MoeSell, J., contra■,) was of opinion that the marshal was not entitled to poundage on the bank notes, being of opinion, from his return, that if they could lawfully be taken, (of which they doubted,) they were not taken into his actual custody so as to make himself chargeable therefor ; but that from the return it appears that he attached only the money and banknotes standing to the credit of TSF. Farrow in the bank.
3 D.C. 367
Ringgold v. Lewis
Decided December 15, 1828
Action on the case, for poundage fees^upon an attachment in favor of Lewis, against Farrow. • The attachment was issued under the Maryland Act of 1795, c. 56.
Decided 1828-12-15