Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Del. 508

Waples v. Layton Sipple

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 5, 1842

Superior Court of Delaware · decided 1842-07-05

I This was an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivereil The plaintiffs proved their book of original entries charging the goocl to defendant under date of 22d November, 1836. They commence® action before justice Ewing on the 20th of March, 1841, and hsl judgment by default, from which the defendant appealed. Pro narr. in assumpsit. Pleas non-assumpsit and the act of limitation.

Decided 1842-07-05

¶1 But the court said, the defendant has a right to plead the act of limitation on the appeal. The suit is precisely as'if it had originated here and the respondent cannot refer to the record of the proceedings below, except to state how this case came here; and the date of the proceeding commenced below, in reference to the plea of limitation.

¶2 As to the other point, there is no admission which we would leave to a jury to take the case out of the act of limitation. The old cases went to a ridiculous extent on this subject, which the modern deci-Isions are overruling. We cannot at least admit any thing to prevent the bar of the statute, which does not amount to an acknow-I ledgment of a subsisting debt; nor leave any thing to the jury, unless j such an acknowledgment can be fairly drawn from it.

¶3 The plaintiffs in this case must be nonsuited,

/3/del/508 · .json · Public domain