Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Dem. Sur. 253

Cluff v. Tower

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1885

New York Surrogate's Court · decided 1885-01-15

Motion by Mary Cluff, decedent’s widow, to set aside an order referring issues presented in her petition for the removal of Edward E. Tower, executor of decedent’s will.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1892

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1885-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Surrogate.

¶11st I have already allowed the widow of this decedent to abandon a proceeding that she recently instituted, reserving until now the question what terms, if any, should be exacted as the condition of the discontinuance. The moving party must pay to her adversary $10 costs.

¶22d. Upon careful review of the various provisions of the Code bearing upon the subject, I am persuaded that the moving party has pursued the proper practice, in her proceeding to ■ set aside the order which directed the submission to a referee of the issues presented in her petition for the removal of the executor, and for his accounting. Section 2481, subd. 6 authorizes the Surrogate, in a proper case, to vacate a decree of his court, and provides that the powers thus granted “must be exercised ..... in the same manner as a court of record and of general jurisdiction exercises the same powers.” That manner is indicated by the practice which, in such courts, is customarily sanctioned in proceedings to set aside or open a judgment. Such proceedings may be begun by a notice of motion, or by an order to show cause.

/3/demsur/253 · .json · Public domain