Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 F.2d 1018

Docket No. 1701.

In re Lilienfeld

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted January 14, 1925.

Decided March 2, 1925.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1925-03-02

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1925-03-02

¶1F. F. Church, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellant.

¶2T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appeal from a Patent Office decision refusing to allow six claims of appellant’s application for a patent. Having carefully examined the record, in the light of appellant’s argument and brief, and finding no error therein, we are content to rest our decision upon the views expressed by the tribunals of the Patent Office. The decision therefore is affirmed.

/3/f2d/1018 · .json · Public domain