Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.2d 336 - Chapman v. Anderson

Chapman v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.2d 336 · 1925

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Melvin v. Pence (1942), May Department Stores Company, Inc. v. Devercelli (1973)

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions

1201925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horning v. District of Columbia · Stewart v. Sonneborn · Wheeler v. Nesbitt · Crum v. State · Markley v. Snow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[If] there is disputed testimony, which should be heard by the jury in determining . . . whether the prosecutor had probable cause, it certainly should be submitted to them under instructions by the court which state such facts, embraced within the record, as would constitute probable cause. . . . [A]nd it devolves upon the court to instruct the jury as to whether certain facts, if, proven, amount to probable cause. . . . [Id. at 169, 3 F.2d at 340 ; emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The question of probable cause is a mixed question of law and fact. Whether the circumstances alleged to show it probable or true, and existed, is a matter of fact; but whether, supposing them to be true, they amount to probable cause, is a question of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.