Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.2d 899 - Cookingham v. Warren Bros.

Cookingham v. Warren Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.2d 899 · 1925

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1983
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1983

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

201925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washburn Moen Manuf'G Co v. Beat 'Em All Barbed-Wire Co · Mast Foos Company v. Stover Manufacturing Company · Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co. · Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & H. Ry. Co. · Diamond Patent Co. v. S. E. Carr Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.