Maxwell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.2d 906 · 1925
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2007
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hollerbach v. United States · Columbus Ry Power Light Co v. City of Columbus Ohio · United States v. Peck · Robert Brent v. The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington · United States v. State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The learned court below did not err in excluding the evidence offered nor in treating as immaterial so much of that admitted as tended to show that the general statutes and the administrative regulations of the United States adopted and enforced as war measures delayed the contractor in his work and made its doing more costly to him. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.