Harris v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 103 · 1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 901 · 30 U.S.C. § 902 · 30 U.S.C. § 932 · 33 U.S.C. § 921
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co. · Hammock v. Bowen · Jones v. Heckler · Wilson v. Benefits Review Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is 'such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' ... While this Court must review the entire record, we may neither redetermine the facts nor substitute our own judgment for that of the [agency].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.