Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 1074 - Perez-Rodriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Perez-Rodriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 1074 · 1993

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Perkovic v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1994), Abebe v. Gonzales (2005)

25 federal appellate ·

220199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Bibby v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be expected to resolve issues that the alien should have raised, but did not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An order of deportation or of exclusion shall not be reviewed by any court if the alien has not exhausted administrative remedies available to him as a matter of right under the immigration laws and regulations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Absent an error of law or unfairness in procedure, the court must affirm the administrative order of deportation if the order is supported by 'reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.