Tague v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 1133 · 1993
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably State v. Rolon (2001), Tyson v. Trigg (1995)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yancey v. Gilmore · Miles v. Burris“[T]he Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Furthermore, the right to confront witnesses 'may, in appropriate cases, bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in the criminal trial process.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.