Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 1398 - United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 district · 4 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · Marek v. Chesny · Latimer v. Stainer · Octopi, Inc. v. Courtney · Puerto Rico Department of Consumer Affairs v. Isla Petroleum Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At any time more than 10 days before the trial begins, a party defending a claim may serve upon the adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be taken against the defending party for the money or property or to the effect specified in the offer, with costs then accrued.... If the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer, the offeree must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.