Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 143 - O'Neal v. Morris

O'Neal v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 143 · 1993

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2012
most recently cited

31 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012 · most notably O'NEAL v. McAninch (1995), Edward Horsley v. State of Alabama (1995)

31 federal appellate ·

380199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Thomas v. Arn · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Arizona v. Fulminante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' "had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury has applied the challenged instruction in a way that violates the Constitution.' " Id. (quoting Estelle v. McGuire, 112 S.Ct. 475 , 482 & n. 4 (1991)) (internal quotations omitted) 17 An Amicus Curiae brief was filed in this case by the Michigan Pharmacists Association ("MPA”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Recently, the Supreme Court changed the rule. In Brecht, the Supreme Court enunciated the standard this Court must apply on habeas review of state court convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.