Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 148 - Fleischhauer v. Feltner

Fleischhauer v. Feltner’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 148 · 1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2011

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Idaho v. Wright · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · In re Disbarment of Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act or event from which the designated period of time begins to run is not to be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be counted, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday,' or legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day that is neither a Saturday, Sunday, nor legal holiday....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e construe this to mean that February 1 was a final deadline. Because February 1 fell on a Saturday does not invalidate the judge's order, nor did it extend the time by reason of local court or federal rules to February 3.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the power to determine the reasonable attorney fees owing to qualified litigants ... includes the discretion to reduce the amount of the fee award based on unsuccessful claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.