Day’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “arising from nuclear incidents. See 42 U.S.C. § 2014 (hh). The federal courts were granted jurisdiction over these actions, and actions filed in state court were subject to removal. 42 U.S.C. § 2210 (n)(2). The amendment was not intended to alter the state law nature of the underlying tort claims. It provides that”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Day v. NLO · Adkins v. Chevron Corp.

2. “(1) the relationship between the adjudicated and unadjudicated claims; (2) the possibility that the need for review might or might not be mooted by future developments in the district court; (3) the possibility that the reviewing court might be obliged to consider the same issue a second time; (4) the presence or absence of a claim or counterclaim which could result in set-off against the judgment sought to be made final; (5) miscellaneous factors such as delay, economic and solvency considerations, shortening the time of trial, frivolity of competing claims, expense and the like.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 128 F. Supp. 2d 1096 - Mead Corp. v. Apfel

3. “Because the nature of plaintiffs’ action is not fully defined and they still have matters pending in the district court, we find that this interlocutory appeal will not serve the interest of judicial economy. We therefore dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal as inappropriate for decision at this time under Rule 54(b).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Day v. NLO