Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 1568 - Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission

Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 1568 · 1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2018

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Trustees v. Greenough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) (formerly the Security Trust Company), the Escrow Agent/Depositary for the Riders' Fund, with the court's approval, appointed Mr. Leonard N. Bebchick to undertake the task of collecting the remainder of the restitutionary damages. 2 Because this court under its equitable powers necessarily retained the power to amend the fee provisions as changed circumstances required, we find that the attorneys do not have a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we do not consider it equitable to enforce such strict construction [of the compromise agreement].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “helps to align more closely the interests of the attorneys with the interests of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.