Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 374 - Bates v. Hunt

Bates v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 374 · 1993

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Edelman v. Jordan · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not have much protection under the First Amendment when he speaks or acts in a hostile way toward his employer”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Treating unequals equally can be unfair. Heatherly and Bates had much different levels of state government experience and were paid much differently. We know of no appellate decision on the Equal Protection clause that holds that the length and the nature of experience in government service cannot be relied on in fixing the pay of employees doing similar work. Bates cites no such case and neither did the district court. Nothing in the Equal Protection Clause plainly says that relevant experience cannot be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Governor of Alabama is elected to lead and to serve the state and its people— a mission of extraordinary importance. If he is to be successful in this difficult mission, he must make effective use of his limited staff. And the Governor need not allow events to unfold to the point where disruption and inefficiency in the Governor’s office become open and obvious, before he constitutionally can discharge an employee. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 151-52 , 103 S.Ct. at 1692 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.