Official Committee of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 49 · 1993
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Eisenstadt v. Centel Corp. (1997), In Re: Peter Iannochino
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Shimer v. Fugazy · Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, S. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] “dispute,” for appealability purposes in the bankruptcy context, means at least an entire claim on which relief may be granted .... In sum, for a bankruptcy court order to be final within the meaning of § 158(d), the order need not resolve all of the issues raised by the bankruptcy; but it must completely resolve all of the issues pertaining to a discrete claim, including issues as to the proper relief.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]y 'disputes' we do not mean merely competing contentions with respect to separable issues; rather, we apply the same standards of finality that we apply to an appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.