United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 506 · 1993
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably United States v. Sepulveda (1993), United States v. Lombard (1995)
30 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Yagow v. United States · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · Mitan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he determination that an amount of money represents proceeds from drug transactions that are part of the same course of conduct as the charged offense, and therefore represents relevant conduct attributable to the defendant, is predominantly factual and reviewable only for clear error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in a case where cash is seized and where either no drug is seized or the amount seized does not reflect the scale of the offense, the sentencing court may estimate the quantity of drugs with which Defendant was involved by converting cash to its drug equivalent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The judge present at the sentencing hearing is in the best position to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the source of the currency, ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.