Dn Associates v. Dn Associates’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 512 · 1993
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 51 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Marcelino Barbosa, Kravit, Gass & Weber, S.C. v. Michel (1998)
20 federal appellate · 51 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 328 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 331
Relies on Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. Mathews · Secretary of Navy v. Avrech · Martin Martin · 25 113 74130 Gsf Corporation · In Re Kendavis Industries International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Historically, bankruptcy courts have been accorded wide discretion in connection with fact-intensive matters and in regard to the terms and conditions of the engagement of professionals.... The bankruptcy judge is on the front line, in the best position to gauge the ongoing interplay of factors and to make the delicate judgment calls which such a decision entails.’ ””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that an appellate court, confronted by a difficult jurisdictional or quasi-jurisdictional question, may forego its resolution if the merits of the appeal are, as here, straightforward and easily resolved in favor of the party or parties to whose benefit the objection to jurisdiction would redound.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given for the bankruptcy court to judge the credibility of witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.