Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 530 - Whitney Bros. v. Sprafkin

Whitney Bros. v. Sprafkin’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 530 · 1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 2003
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In Re Spm Manufacturing Corporation · Kowalski v. Gagne · Peter Fuller Enterprises, Inc. v. Manchester Savings Bank · DeCato Bros. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp. · Hermes Automation Technology, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) and named himself and defendant David Sprafkin trustees. Plaintiff Griffin Stabler owned 32.7% of the shares, and his son, David Stabler, owned the remaining 4.7%. 5 On January 27, 1987, Whitney Brothers, the trustees, and Griffin Stabler executed a written buy/sell agreement (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.