Miranti v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
3 F.3d 925 · 1993
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Carpenter v. Wichita Falls Independent School District (1995), Mints v. Educational Testing Service (1996)
25 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1448
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Marino v. Ortiz · Sheet Metal Workers’ International Assn., AFL-CIO v. Carter · Marino v. Ortiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) A motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect in removal procedure must be made within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal under section 1446(a). If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded. An order remanding the case may require payment of just costs and actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of the removal.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the propriety of the defendant's removal continues to be central in determining whether to impose fees”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.