Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 F.3d 958 - Longo v. McLaren

Longo v. McLaren’s Empirical Analysis

3 F.3d 958 · 1993

Citation profile

193
cited by 193 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 193 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Rembert v. AT & T Universal Card Services, Inc. (1998), In Re Adams Barclays/american Business Credit Inc (1994)

18 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

760199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp. · Alexander v. Hillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 193 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the debtor obtained money through a material misrepresentation that, at the time, the debtor knew was false or made with gross recklessness as to its truth; (2) the debtor intended to deceive the creditor; (3) the creditor justifiably relied on the false representation; and (4) its reliance was the proximate cause of loss.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If it is acknowledged as beyond question that a complaint to determine discharge-ability of a debt is exclusively within the equitable jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court, then it must follow that the bankruptcy court may also render a money judgment in an amount certain without the assistance of a jury. This is true not merely because equitable jurisdiction attaches to the entire cause of action but more importantly because it is impossible to separate the determination of dis-chargeability function from the function of fixing the amount of the non-dis-chargeable debt.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'to all the consequences that attach to an appearance,'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.