Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 F. App'x 110

Looker v. Godwin

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-02-13

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · See v. City of Seattle

Decided 2001-02-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing Defendants Godwin, Raffety, and “other unknown federal officials” and denying Looker’s motion for change of venue. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

¶2We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3DISMISSED.

/3/fappx/110 · .json · Public domain