¶1 John T. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac *133 cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Swann, No. CA-00-711-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.