Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 F. App'x 22

Echols v. Caldera

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-02-01

Decided 2001-02-01

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Deloyise Echols appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Echols v. Caldera, No. CA-00-247-A (E.D.Va. Apr. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/3/fappx/22 · .json · Public domain