Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 F. App'x 23

Duckett v. Kupec

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-02-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2010

1 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 George Cecil Duckett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Duckett v. Kupec, No. CA-00-2626-L (D.Md. Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/3/fappx/23 · .json · Public domain