¶1 Charles Davidson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his suit alleging state and federal claims against several Arkansas public officials and private individuals. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude Davidson did not state a claim pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Because Davidson asserted no other basis for federal jurisdiction, we also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Davidson’s remaining claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions.
3 F. App'x 574
Charles Davidson v. Paula Casey
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2001
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-02-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2009
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-02-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →